BIBLE STUDY – SUNDAY, DECEMBER 22, 2019

BIBLE STUDY – SUNDAY, DECEMBER 22, 2019

Too often those who worry about whether we are required to believe in the virgin birth do so assuming they are being asked to believe something for which there is no evidence. But Matthew is telling the story of the God who refuses to abandon us—and even becomes one of us so we might be redeemed. Virgin births are not surprising given that this is the God who has created us without us, but who will not save us without us. What the Father does through the Spirit to conceive Mary’s child is not something different that what God does through creation. God does not need to intervene in creation, because God has never been absent from creation. Creation is not “back there,” but it is God’s ongoing love of all he has willed and continues to will to exist.

What should startle us, what should stun us, is not that Mary is a virgin, but that God refuses to abandon us. God’s actuality means that any attempt to explain, to render the virgin birth explicable in a naturalistic term, is a mistake. Just as we can’t explain creation we cannot and should not try to explain how Jesus can at once be fully God and fully man. The Nicene creed does not explain the Trinity and incarnation, but rather teaches us how to speak of the mystery of God without explanation. Additionally, the creed helps reproduce the character of the gospels, that is, the only way to speak of what God has done for us in Jesus Christ is to tell the story, the story of Mary’s being found with child though she and Joseph had not “known one another.” That is why Matthew does not try to prepare us for the story of Mary by providing a transition from the genealogies to the story of Mary’s pregnancy. Rather, he tells us in a straightforward, if not blunt, manner that “the birth of Jesus the Messiah took place in this way.” Again, we see that Matthew does not assume that it is his task to make God’s work intelligible to us, but rather his task is to show us how we can live in the light of Jesus’s conception and birth.

“Christ has died, Christ has risen, Christ will come again,” we affirm at every Communion. But we should not forget that “Christ was born.” The second person of the Trinity was conceived and born in the needing care of a mother. To be human is to be vulnerable, but to be a baby is to be vulnerable in a manner we spend a lifetime denying. Indeed, Jesus was a baby refusing to forego the vulnerability that would climax in his crucifixion. And as such, Jesus was entrusted to the care of Mary and Joseph. They could not save him from the crucifixion, but they were necessary to making his life possible. We rightly celebrate, therefore, the Holy Family.

Matthew’s story of Mary’s pregnancy lacks the charm and detail of Luke’s account, but that may be its value. One of the great enemies of the gospels is sentimentality, and the stories surrounding Jesus’s birth have proven to be ready material for sometimes self-pitying sentiment. Matthew’s account of Jesus’s conception and birth is unapologetically realistic. Joseph, not Mary, is the main actor. John Chrysostom praises Joseph as a man of exceptional self-restraint since he must have been free of that most cruel passion, Jealousy. Unwilling to cause Mary distress, to expose her to public disgrace, he planned to dismiss her discreetly. Therefore, he refused to act according to Jewish law, but rather chose to act in a manner that Jesus himself would later exemplify by his attitude toward known sinners (Matt. 9:10-13).

Yet Joseph still required a revelation so that he would know the meaning of Mary’s pregnancy. He is also given the honor to name Jesus as the new Joshua capable of rescuing his people from their sins. The Joshua of old had been given the task of conquering the promise land, but this Joshua is sent to save his people from their sins, making it possible for them to live as people of the promise. Joseph did as he was instructed, taking Mary for his wife and naming his son Jesus.

Moreover, Matthew tells us all this was done so the prophecy of Isaiah 7:14 would be fulfilled. This is the first time that Matthew uses the formula “all this took place to fulfill what had been spoken by the Lord,” but he will use these words often to show how Jesus fulfilled the prophecies of the Old Testament. It may be tempting to suggest that Matthew is forcing his writings to conform to a prior writing, like Isaiah’s, but that is to assume Mary was not in fact a virgin when in fact she must have been. We now rightly know how to read Isaiah 7:14 because Mary IS the young woman and she IS a virgin.

Mary had to be a virgin, because Jesus is the Son of God. There is no way to prove Mary’s virginity other than to observe that without Mary’s virginity the story cannot be told. Mary’s virginity is simply required by the way the story runs. The one she gave birth to is none other that Emmanuel, “God with us,” and such a one can have no other father than the Father who is the first person of the Trinity. It is important that Isaiah 7:14 be fulfilled, but that a virgin give birth to the Son is crucial for our understanding of the Father.

We do not have a “here am I” in Matthew as we do in Luke’s Mary, but that in no way lessens Mary’s significance. Without Mary’s obedience, without her willingness to receive the Holy Spirit, our salvation would be in doubt. With some justification Mary is often identified as the second Eve, but Mary is also our Abraham. Just as Abraham obeyed God’s call for him to leave his familiar land to journey to a foreign destination, so Mary through her willingness to become the very Mother of God is the beginning of the church. She is the firstborn of the new creation faithfully responding to the Son who calls into being a new people.

Jesus is born of a Jewish mother. His flesh is Jewish flesh. To be sure Jewish flesh is human, but Christians dare not forget that the flesh that is “very man” is particularly the flesh of Mary. Matthew will not let us forget that the one born of Mary is the one who has come to free Israel from its sins. Jesus is very God and very man, but that does not mean that we can ever forget that the God he is, and the man he is, is the same God that has promised to always be faithful to the people of Israel.

 

Sunday, December 15th Sermon

DECEMBER 15, 2019 – Jim Rach, Lay Minister

Hope needs a desert in which to bloom. This is what advent tells us, Elizabeth and Mary, John the Baptist, Jesus, new life born in impossible places. Hope, blooming in the desert.

This also reminds us in this season of advent that we do not come by hope easily. It is not mere optimism, a naïve thought, hope digs in deep, it has to. If optimism makes us think that someday soon things will go better for us, hope frees us from having to predict the future and allows us to live in the present, with a deep trust that God will never leave us alone.

And so, in that sense, maybe the gap separating the two is filled with trust. Optimism justifies our lack of trust, hope needs trust to survive.

And like most things in the desert hope is also dangerous. So, while it is preferable to mere optimism, one can see why optimism wins the popular vote. Optimism is a blueprint for a house that will never be built, ultimately worthless, but it helps us sleep at night.

Hope is trusting, believing, with all your heart, that God is paving a path beneath your worn- out feet. I like hope, I like that our Christian hope compels us to pray alleluia through our tears at the grave site. I like that the Christian hope takes the instrument of our savior’s death, and rather than shy away from it, calls it victory. I like that our Christian hope gives us the eyes to see spring through winter. I like that our Christian hope is placed in a weak, peasant baby, instead of the more logical choice, the powerful emperor who ruled that world.

I like hope, but I recognize hope is dangerous. Because hope dreams impossible dreams. The prophet Isaiah in our reading today is giving us those impossible dreams, and he is speaking to a barren land. His audience is the aftermath of the Babylonia destruction of Jerusalem, imagine 9-11 plus the rest of New York City destroyed. The broken souls left wandering in the desert, far away from home. Isaiah is bringing these dreams to exiles, exiled not only from their land, but also from their hope.

And I am not sure it is fair. I’m not sure it is fair to plant in their souls the hope that one day their torched earth will bloom, that one day their broken bodies will leap for joy, or that one day their despairing hearts will grow strong again. Because isn’t the acceptance of the current reality better than hope unfulfilled and isn’t hope just belief in a search of a guarantee that will never come.

The problem with hope is that it believes in big things, when low expectations are so much easier to meet. That is one of the reasons that hope is so dangerous, it never knows when to stop. It doesn’t believe in low expectations, I guess because it so stubbornly believes in God.

Isaiah begins with great expectations. He begins with impossible dreams. The deserts shall bloom. We might see that as a golf course in Arizona, but It’s certainly not that. It’s healing. It’s the dream of new green life after the enemy sets the fields on fire. It’s a strip mine scars returning to beauty. It’s Eden before the curse. And it was far, far away.

But, yet, Isaiah dreams bigger. He dreams of war- ravaged bodies being restored. The ecological scars, the devastation of the land, that was one thing, but these scars were personal. This hope is the hope that touches open wounds, that threatens brokenness. This hope is the kind of hope that feels embarrassing to admit. Embarrassing like we believe in the resurrection of the body and the life everlasting. Embarrassing like saying your impossible dreams out loud.

But Isaiah dreams bigger. He dreams impossible dreams of a way back home. And he shouts these dreams over prison walls. This is what hope looked like in a concentration camp. Isaiah dreams of a future, he dreams of a future in a place where survival is as good as it gets. In a place where heartlessness is a defense mechanism, Isaiah lowers defenses, and dares to ask the people to do the same.

There was no reason for optimism, no more than when the Israelites were slaves in Egypt.

Optimism cannot live behind bars.

But hope, hope sings behind bars. Hope is Paul and Silas praising God behind bars till the earthquake comes, hope is remembering that the exodus happened, hope is that the Incarnation happened, that the resurrection happened.

Advent can be a dangerous season because it makes us dream dreams. It inspires hope. It awakes us from our sleep. It shakes us loose from the contentment from which the powers of this world rely.

We are not required to accept the brokenness and pain in this world, we do not have to accept the march of violence and hatred. We were not created to surrender to the forces of addiction and despair. Our healing is not found in the acquisition of goods, our salvation is not hidden in our lowered expectations.

We are people of hope. It is easy to look at our world, to watch the news or read the blogs, and lose hope. The pain and division that reside in our world seem insurmountable, tensions simmer, words of hatred escalate, suicide rates continue to climb, as do heroin and other drug related deaths. We proclaim our hope in a world of exiles, hopelessly wandering in the desert. We claim our hope because we know how this story goes. We know that hope needs a desert in which to bloom. We know that God births new life in impossible places. We know that God proclaims impossible dreams.

This is what advent tells us, it tells us that God gives us hope. Hope frees us from the need to predict the future and allows us to live in the present, with the deep trust that God will never leave us alone. Not in Egypt’s slavery, not in the pain of exile, not even in the grave.

God will never leave us alone. And that is why we dare to hope. That even at the grave we can shout our alleluias. This is the story advent tells. It is a story of a God who will never leave us alone. The God who wrapped an impossible dream in a manger in Bethlehem, to give the world hope.

 

Sunday Bible Study – December 15, 2019

Bible Study Matthew 11: 2-11, Gospel reading for December 15

Did John ask the question “are you the one who is to come, or should we expect another?” because he didn’t know. Most scholars would comment that yes, John knew, for before he had expressed the words “Behold, the Lamb of God” and “one greater than me shall come after me.” And John still has people following him. So, from prison he tells them to stop following me and he sends them out so that they would realize who Christ was. And Jesus, instead of telling them yes, tells the people, “go and report what you hear and see (vs. 4-6).” That, Jesus says, should be enough for you to realize who I am. That is the reason John asked the question, that they should stop following John and start following Christ.

And then Jesus says, “What did you go out to see?” Did you not hear what John preached in the desert, did you think his words and actions had now changed with this question in vs 3. Jesus goes on that John was the most righteous of all, he had been put in prison because of who I am, and yet you still follow John instead of me?

So, Malachi 3 and 4 talked of the coming of John the Baptist, and Christ talked of him as the new Elijah, the one who would be the greatest of the prophets, because he was the only prophet that other prophets foretold of. He is one of the signs of Christ coming into the world.
So, Christ referred to him as Elijah, he led a similar life, but there is more to it than that. There was a tradition that Elijah would come before the second coming.
If you turn to Revelation 11:3-12, you will find a lot of references to Elijah, such as being able to stop the rain is one of the miracles Elijah did, the sackcloth, the going up into heaven, we know that Elijah was one who did not actually die. The scholars have always agreed that one of these two witnesses was Elijah, but there is not an agreement on who the other one was. Some think it was Enoch, a very holy man who lived before Noah, and was taken up into heaven without dying. That being taken up was the main reason some think it was him.
But the other possibility is Moses. Why, well one of the miracles is turning water into blood, which Moses did. They are referred as the two witnesses, who were the two that saw God on the mountain, Elijah and Moses. They both came face to face with God on the mountain, although Moses covers his face with a veil. Who are the two prophets who appear with Christ at the transfiguration on Mt. Tabor, Moses and Elijah. Its not a big deal theologically who the second one is, but it is interesting.

The important part for this lesson is the one is Elijah, who is announcing the coming of Christ. And John the Baptist is said to be the new Elijah.
A second line of thinking for our gospel today is that Matt. 11 begins with a sentence: “Now when Jesus had finished instructing his twelve disciples.” Matthew had previously used this sentence at the end of the Sermon on the Mount (7:28), and he ends Jesus’s parables with the same sentence (13:53). Matthew also uses this formula in 19:1 and 26:1, making a total of five. This may be Matthew relating his gospel to the five books of Moses. Remember, Matthew was a Jew through and through, so for Matthew, Moses prefigures Jesus by giving the law; but Jesus is greater than Moses because he now is the gift of the law.

John is in prison for holding Herod to the observance of the law (Matt. 14: 1-11), but it is not clear that Jesus and John have the same understanding of the law. Matthew has indicated that John, like the Pharisees, thought it necessary to fast frequently (9:14-17). Jesus acknowledges that he does not require his disciples to fast, and he has even befriended tax collectors and sinners. Because of this, Jesus has earned a reputation for being a glutton and drunkard.
Jesus answers John’s question in 11:3 by calling attention to the fruits of his ministry. In response to the charge that he is a glutton and drunkard, Jesus observes that “wisdom is vindicated by her deeds”(Matt. 11:19). He, therefore, calls attention to his deeds, noting that those who take no offense at him will be blessed. Jesus answers John’s question by directing attention to the power unleashed through his ministry.

So, Jesus claims that John is more than a prophet. Yet as great as John is, he remains the least in the kingdom of heaven because John, like Moses, stands on the edge of a new age. Herods will try to defeat the kingdom heralded by John with violence, but it cannot be so overwhelmed. John the Baptist can be arrested and killed, Jesus will be crucified, but the kingdom that John proclaims comes through peace brought by Jesus. This kingdom is not some ideal of peace that requires the use of violence for its realization. Rather, the kingdom is Jesus, the one who has the power to overcome violence through love.

 

Sunday, December 8, 2019 Sermon

Opening December 8
In our gospel for today, what a strange figure John the Baptist must have
presented. He appeared in the wilderness. He was dressed in camel hair with a
leather belt around his waist. He lived on locusts and wild honey. His dress
reminds us of Elijah, who is described in 2 Kings 1:8. Elijah, the prophet who was
taken into heaven in a chariot without dying, was long expected to be the one to
return to pronounce judgement as well as to inaugurate the new age. The Old
testament ends with this saying, (read Malachi 4: 4-6). John is clearly this Elijah.
Jesus explicitly identifies John with Elijah in Matt. 11:14. The jubilee year, the
restoration of land and people outlined in Lev. 25 and interpreted by Isaiah 61, the
long- awaited overturning of injustice that John said was coming-all these Jesus
claims are accomplished in his ministry. John is found in the wilderness eating
food that can John’s sermon, “only be gathered. John, as Elijah, recapitulates the
wilderness wanderings that Israel experienced after its exodus from Egypt. Israel’s
experience in the wilderness was at once a punishment for its abandonment as
well as a place for its formation. In the wilderness Israel learned to be without
possessions so that it might be led by God’s fiery cloud as well as to live on food
that came only as a gift. In Amos 2:10-11 God reminds his people (read Amos)
“repent, for the kingdom of heaven is near,” is not as obscure as it may appear.

So, what would it have meant for John to call for repentance? Our temptation is to
think of repentance in individual terms, but John is a prophet of Israel. He
represents God’s decisive action on behalf of Israel to save Israel from its failure
to live as God’s people. That John baptizes in the Jordan is a reminder of Israel’s
baptism in Exodus by Moses’s parting of the waters. Israel had to face death as it
walked across the dry land between the walls of water. John’s baptism calls Israel
again to face death that it might live.
Finally, John was not offering a better way to live, though a better way to live was
entailed by the kingdom that he proclaimed was near. But it is the proclamation of
the “kingdom of heaven” that creates the urgency of John’s ministry. Such a
kingdom does not come through our trying to be better people. Rather, the
kingdom comes, making imperative our repentance. John’s call for Israel to repent
is not a prophetic call for those who repent to change the world, but rather he calls
for repentance because the world is being and will be changed by the one whom
John knows is to come.

December 8, 2019 Sermon
Today is the second Sunday of the advent season. We have yet caught site
of the pregnant Virgin Mary, or the dazed and confused Joseph. We have
yet to see angels. It’s seems surly we would have arrived at the gates of
Bethlehem by now. Yet our readings have yet to give us any of those
familiar advent events.

Instead, we get guesses, predictions of prophet and poet. Prophets staring
into a distant future their eyes would never see. The visions of Isaiah and
the psalmist, the visions as abstract as they are thrilling, as they are
hopeful, speak of the world as it might be.

But not only that they speak of the Messiah, long promised, long expected,
who will finally make the dream a reality.

The prophet Isaiah dreams of a peaceable kingdom, a kingdom where the
wolf snuggles with the lamb, and lions with goats. He dreams of world
where children no longer need to fear the serpents bite. He dreams of a
world as Eden, a return to creation, before things went bad, when creation
lived in harmony, when peace reigned. Before the forbidden fruit, before
Cain killed Able, before violence came and blood soaked the ground. That
is the dream, the world as it might be, as it might be again.

But that world in Isaiah’s vision can only come with the Messiah. And so,
he also dreams of a Messiah. The vision of the Messiah starts beautifully
strong, he would bond with the meek, he will love and support the poor.

That sounds good. But then things get confusing.

Because that same Messiah starts breathing fire. And that beautiful,
peaceful vision goes up in smoke. “With the breath of his lips, he shall kill
the wicked.”

Mostly hopeful, thrilling, if not exactly peaceful. The psalmist takes the
same path, “he shall usher in peace, but crush his oppressors. Probably all
that crushing will disturb the peace.

And then we come to John the Baptist. He doesn’t say much about peace.
Not accused of being subtle, not known for his sunny disposition, John lays
out his own vision of the future. And it is chalked full of wrath. He also
describes his vision of the coming messiah. The messiah will baptize with
the Holy Spirit. That’s sounds good. And also, that messiah is carrying a
winnowing fork in his hand, and if you are curious, a winnowing fork looks
like a giant Freddie Kruger hand. And with this fork he will clear the
threshing floor before he sets it ablaze, with unquenchable fire. So again,
something of a mixed bag.

We have yet to see the Virgin Mary, we have yet to see the gentle Joseph,
the angels have not yet made an appearance. But what we do see is an
unsettling vision of the coming messiah. Are we expected to be excited or afraid?

For centuries the prophets of old have waited for the messiah to come.

They waited and waited and waited. And the expectations grew. They
waited for a king, they waited for a warrior. They waited for a messiah who
breathed fire, who crushed oppressors, who carried the winnowing fork.

And then he came, the messiah, but he did not meet the expectations. The
prophet Isaiah imagines that when the messiah arrives, the people will no
longer hurt or destroy. He imagines peace on the hills of Jerusalem.

But the messiah came, and the people hurt him, the people destroyed him.
And instead of peace on the hills, there stood on the hill an old rugged
cross. The cross that held the long-awaited messiah.

The psalmist says that when the messiah arrives, he will rule the people,
and crush the oppressors. But the people were not interested in his rule.

Once upon a time they thought he might make a suitable king, he was good
at bread production. They saw potential. But then the bread dried, and he
offered them his body instead. And they realized he was not at all what
they were looking for, not what they wanted. They wanted someone who
would either make them rich or make them safe, and he would do neither.
The people walked away, and the oppressors crushed him.

And John the Baptist imagines that when the messiah arrives, he will finally
usher in the coming judgement. He will separate the good from the bad and
punish those in the bad pile. But Jesus did not make separate piles, instead
he prayed that they might all be one. And the only fire that came was the
fire of Pentecost, it was unquenchable, but no one was burnt. And instead
of punishing the bad folks, Jesus ate with them. He invited some of them to
be his disciples, and he forgave them from the cross.

John was so confused, he sent some of his followers to ask, “are you the
messiah, or should we be waiting for someone else?” For centuries faithful
people had been waiting for the messiah to come, to conquer. The first time
he came he did not meet the expectations.

So perhaps the second time, maybe the second time he comes he will
meet our expectations and be the powerful ruler we need, or at least we
want. Faithful people are still searching the skies for this divine conqueror.
We are still waiting for the messiah with blade in hand, fire in hand, smoke
in nostrils, and violence in his eyes. We are waiting for the messiah who
will destroy our enemies. Jesus said, “Love your enemies, pray for those
who persecute you.”

The first time the messiah came, he came wrapped in baby soft skin. No
sword, no fire, no violence, not what we expected. Now we await his
second coming.

God willing, he will fail to meet our expectations again.